Skip to main content

Process Quality Dashboard

Looking back isn't always a bad thing. Pleasant memories aside, it also allows one to review earlier works in the light and knowledge of current experience and to realize how much path we have journeyed on since.

I found a folder in my old computer the other evening and it was password-protected. Utterly curious as to what it might contain, I opened it to find copies of monthly dashboards I made in my earlier organization. Thereafter, it was mostly reliving old memories as I browsed through them all, looking at them and thinking of making them better.

One of my favourite dashboards to make then was the Quality Dashboard. 10+ teams, 10+ performance parameters, 100+ associates, it was some ordeal to get all of them in a series of PowerPoint slides. Some dashboard too! Over 15 slides and in excess of 20 charts!

I copied the data to a fresh Excel worksheet, altered and changed some of the names, and started a dashboard which in 3 simple tables will allow the user to review the overall program, the performance of the teams and finally, the performance of every associate.


Remembering the extra hours we needed to put in afterwards to salvage the names of top performers and outliers for R&R and feedbacks. I designed the table to highlight such names automatically. For a few hours of effort, a lifetime of reduced stress in office.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please do not post spam or promote your own site(s). Comments are moderated and such comments will not be published.

Also, please keep your comment relevant to the topic of the article.

Finally, please do not post any of your personally identifiable information such as phone number, email address or other important details as this is an open platform.

Popular posts from this blog

The Cricket Graphs: The Forgotten Chart

The fun of receiving feedback to blog posts is that one isn't quite sure what they might come up against. While mostly it provides fascinating discussions, insightful comments or explanatory questions, there is also the odd occasion when it throws up unusual requests. The other day I received an email in response to my post, The Cricket Graphs . The sender wanted me to create a "Partnership" chart, which would show the runs scored by the pair of batsmen for every wicket and the balls faced. I went searching for data on the Cricinfo website , and picked out the 3rd ODI  between the South African and Australian cricket teams which was played out in Kingsmead, Durban on October 28, 2011. The Partnership details were taken from the page titled Partnerships Table and the total balls faced by individual batsmen from the Scorecard. Constructing the graphs was a somewhat tricky affair, with two potential bar charts in two axes representing Balls and Runs, which had me w...
1 comment
Read more

Florence Nightingale Circumplex Chart

I was taken to the  Florence Nightingale's Wiki page   during a recent research, and one of the interesting things I noted was her contribution to statistics. It came to me as a pleasant surprise that she is credited with inventing the polar area diagram , or occasionally the Nightingale rose diagram, which is equivalent to a modern circular histogram. Following the completion of my project and in my weekend to spare, I devoted time to recreating the chart in Excel. It took a combination of Doughnut-Pie-and XY charts and close to four hours to finish it. The colours are a bit darker, the values are approximate and the labels differently oriented, yet the chart looks fairly close to the original as is shown by the picture below.
2 comments
Read more

US Open Tennis

Charting a sporting event is always great fun. More so, if that happens to be the vibrant US Open Tennis Championships which I came across in this piece . But to me, it appeared somewhat wayward and lacking purpose. Most of its charts could have been more efficiently represented through a table, and the only one which made some sense, or added some value was the one that depicted the US women’s singles champion by country over time (1900 - 2011). I decided to approach this from a different perspective. Firstly, I separated the amateur years from the Open era which began in 1968. From 1881-1911, the US Open used a challenge system whereby the defending champion automatically qualified for the next year's final, creating in the bargain, some unbelievable feats like Richard Sears remaining undefeated in the tournament and winning the inaugural seven editions of the Championships. Furthermore, the difficulty in travelling to and from the USA in the earlier years can also be attri...
Post a Comment
Read more